Present Books Concering Phaedo
| Original Title: | Φαίδων |
| ISBN: | 0192839535 (ISBN13: 9780192839534) |
| Edition Language: | English |
| Literary Awards: | جائزة الدولة التشجيعية في الفلسفة لعام (1975) |
Plato
Paperback | Pages: 144 pages Rating: 4.04 | 9582 Users | 321 Reviews
Narrative Toward Books Phaedo
The Phaedo is acknowledged to be one of Plato's masterpieces, showing him both as a philosopher and as a dramatist at the height of his powers. For its moving account of the execution of Socrates, the Phaedo ranks among the supreme literary achievements of antiquity. It is also a document crucial to the understanding of many ideas deeply ingrained in western culture, and provides one of the best introductions to Plato's thought.
Particularize Epithetical Books Phaedo
| Title | : | Phaedo |
| Author | : | Plato |
| Book Format | : | Paperback |
| Book Edition | : | Anniversary Edition |
| Pages | : | Pages: 144 pages |
| Published | : | 1993 by Oxford University Press (first published -380) |
| Categories | : | Philosophy. Classics. Nonfiction |
Rating Epithetical Books Phaedo
Ratings: 4.04 From 9582 Users | 321 ReviewsWrite-Up Epithetical Books Phaedo
A very readable and reliable translation from Brann, Kalkavage and Salem. Terms are translated consistently, and the glossary is a useful guide to understanding both the etymology of the words translated and the ways in which Plato uses the terms, as well as related terms. (Explaining in a succinct way the relation and differences between Being [ousia], beings [ta onta], the Forms [eide], and "looks" [idea] is not easy, and here it is necessarily over-simplified, but the glossary entry can bePhaedo is the final part of Plato's (427-347 BCE) trilogy about the trial and death of his teacher, Socrates (469-399 BCE), and is preceded by the Apology and Crito . The Apology is a riveting account of Socrates' defense against the charges, his reaction to the verdict, and then his reaction to the sentence. Crito is a moving account of his reaction to an opportunity to escape his sentence. (I've written reviews for these in GR, if you're curious.) In this dialogue Plato has a young
Definitely one of my favourite dialogues. I got teary eyed at the end. I could talk about souls and immortality and opposites and ways of knowing for hours and this dialogue made me feel like I was right there with Socrates, Phaedo, Plato, Thebans, Cebes and Simmias. Highly recommend.
Socrates died with quiet dignity. He was sentenced to drink a fatal dose of hemlock before nightfall. But first, he spent the day with friends and family discussing philosophy. PHAEDO is Platos account of that day.In PHAEDO, Plato recounts Socrates arguments for the immortality of the soul. These arguments are not impressive to modern readers. We easily see flaws in Socrates logic. This begs the question, did Socrates genuinely believe his arguments for the existence of the soul? Or was there
3.5 stars [Humanism]Philosophical Method: 4.5. Philosophical Conclusions: 2 and 5. Plato's Phaedo deserves its status as a classic. Typical in its lively, Socratic dialectic that I love so much, Plato delivers some strike-outs, and one shining jewel in the rough.The Socratic method is almost flawless. It is based upon the idea of collectively asking questions about an idea, working through the logic of it via assenting or dissenting examples, and basing any conclusions only from the standpoints
---Update 2017---I did a quick read-through of this while traveling a couple of days ago. What stuck out to me this time was Simmias's analogy of the soul to the attunement of a lyre. One of Socartes's objections is that the attunement theory is inconsistent with the theory of recollection, itself not established, but also that the attunement theory does not explain the soul's rule of the body. I am wondering: if the soul rules the body, is this not rather proof that the soul and body are
Socrates' last discussion before being executed as recorded by Plato from the perspective of Socrates' former students, Phaedo... The discussion expounds on the afterlife and the soul's immortality to which he presents four arguments: 1. Argument from Opposites - i.e. a perpetual cycle of life and death, when we die we do not stay dead, but come back to life after a time.2. Theory of Recollection - i.e. learning is actually recollecting what is already known3. Argument from Affinity - i.e. there
0 Comments