Mention Books Concering The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind
| Original Title: | The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind |
| ISBN: | 0618057072 (ISBN13: 9780618057078) |
| Edition Language: | English |
| Literary Awards: | National Book Award Finalist for Contemporary Thought (1978) |
Julian Jaynes
Paperback | Pages: 491 pages Rating: 4.25 | 4084 Users | 496 Reviews
Rendition In Favor Of Books The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind
At the heart of this classic, seminal book is Julian Jaynes's still-controversial thesis that human consciousness did not begin far back in animal evolution but instead is a learned process that came about only three thousand years ago and is still developing. The implications of this revolutionary scientific paradigm extend into virtually every aspect of our psychology, our history and culture, our religion -- and indeed our future.
Identify Based On Books The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind
| Title | : | The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind |
| Author | : | Julian Jaynes |
| Book Format | : | Paperback |
| Book Edition | : | First Mariner Edition |
| Pages | : | Pages: 491 pages |
| Published | : | August 15th 2000 by Mariner Books (first published 1976) |
| Categories | : | Psychology. Philosophy. Nonfiction. Science. History |
Rating Based On Books The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind
Ratings: 4.25 From 4084 Users | 496 ReviewsAssess Based On Books The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind
I must fall back on description of the book given by someone else: it is "either complete rubbish or the work of a consummate genius ... nothing in between."Gave the book 4 stars because it is one of those books that really makes you think about everything. What Jaynes does do is to look at the periods of history and identify a pattern of psychological differences over time by analyzing the writing left to us by those people. He sees a rather distinct change happen about 1000 BCE in the middleI am giving this a five not because I buy into what Jaynes is saying, actually if anything I finished the book still a 100% skeptical about his ideas, but because his approach, his idea and his presentation was actually extremely good. Whether this proves true or not it was still vastly interesting and at least a new way at looking at the evolution of man. I mean when we look at evolution as it is we have to determine SOME point in time where man gained this thing we call consciousness. Some
"It is one of those books that is either complete rubbish or a work of consummate genius, nothing in between!"Richard Dawkins
A mind-fuck of the highest order. A work of polymathemetical genius, probably wrong on many accounts but absolutely original in its approach. Extremely readable, unpretentious prose and probings into one of life's coolest mysteries. You'll never read the Oddessey the same way again, or think about schizophrenia or Ancient Sumeria in the same way. It's speculative power has made many a head spin, I think.
This was one of the most stimulating and important books I've ever encountered by a psychologist. Although flawed in some important respects, it is profoundly provocative, suggesting areas for further speculation and research not only in psychology, but also in the cultural anthropology of religions.The primary flaw of Jayne's work is his literary evidence for the claim that humans didn't develop reflective consciousness until ca. 1000 BCE. He relies too much on the earlier texts of the Iliad
2015.12.272015.12.31This book presents the controversial theory/hypothesis of bicameralism according to which "the human mind once assumed a state in which cognitive functions were divided between one part of the brain which appears to be 'speaking', and a second part which listens and obeysa bicameral mind." This was to me new and interesting and I'll have to read more before deciding what to make of it. At the very least the book was structured so pleasantly that I warmly recommend it as
What's particularly hard to swallow about this book is that Jaynes goes far to argue for undermining not only how we know ourselves but also how we are to account for what we are doing. One of the basic rubrics of science and philosophy is our concept of consciousness, as a container for our individuality and our ability to comprehend/experience. To question consciousness itself in the form that we believe it comes in, in the method by which we determine ourselves is to question the very
0 Comments