Adam Zamoyski
Paperback | Pages: 704 pages Rating: 4.3 | 1713 Users | 128 Reviews
Mention Out Of Books Moscow 1812: Napoleon's Fatal March
| Title | : | Moscow 1812: Napoleon's Fatal March |
| Author | : | Adam Zamoyski |
| Book Format | : | Paperback |
| Book Edition | : | Deluxe Edition |
| Pages | : | Pages: 704 pages |
| Published | : | August 9th 2005 by Harper Perennial (first published August 3rd 2004) |
| Categories | : | History. Nonfiction. Cultural. Russia. Military. Military History. War. Military Fiction. France |
Commentary As Books Moscow 1812: Napoleon's Fatal March
Napoleon dominated nearly all of Europe by 1810, largely succeeding in his aim to reign over the civilized world. But Britain eluded him. To conquer the island nation, he needed Russia's Tsar Alexander's help. The Tsar refused, and Napoleon vowed to teach him a lesson by intimidation and force. The ensuing invasion of Russia, during the frigid winter of 1812, would mark the beginning of the end of Napoleon's empire. Although his army captured Moscow after a brutal march deep into hostile territory, it was a hollow victory for the demoralized troops. Napoleon's men were eventually turned back, and their defeat was a momentous turning point in world affairs. Dramatic, insightful, and enormously absorbing, Moscow 1812 is a masterful work of history.Declare Books Conducive To Moscow 1812: Napoleon's Fatal March
| Original Title: | Moscow 1812: Napoleon's Fatal March |
| ISBN: | 006108686X (ISBN13: 9780061086861) |
| Edition Language: | English |
| Literary Awards: | International Napoleonic Society Literary Award (2004) |
Rating Out Of Books Moscow 1812: Napoleon's Fatal March
Ratings: 4.3 From 1713 Users | 128 ReviewsComment On Out Of Books Moscow 1812: Napoleon's Fatal March
This book provides an excellent and comprehensive account of all the complex factors that led to Napolean's disastrous invasion of Russia in 1812. Like any good work of historical scholarship, the author starts with information detailing what set the stage for the invasion, and he then takes the reader in detail through the invasion itself, from the early French successes, to the wasted time in Moscow, to the miserable winter retreat across western Russia. What I found most impressive in thisI've come to accept that in order to read any history that involves the Russian people I'm going to have to be prepared for a high level of revulsion at the sheer amount of human suffering it takes for that people to make even the slightest step forward or back. This book is so well written that it will horrify you. As events escelate the the Grande Armee finds itself shorter on food, without horses, and colder by the day, their suffering becomes almost unbearable to read about. "The Second
Zamoyski's books are always a literary and historical treat. Moscow 1812 is no exception. This is a brutal endurance-test as well as a necessary revision of certain historical presumptions, especially for the Anglophone world. Zamoyski pours cold water on the notion that Kutusov was a great general, one of the initial claims I found surprising. The narrative argues the point fairly persuasively. Zamoyski proves an absolutely expert at showing just how hubristic Napoleon was, and how his invasion
This book starts with a birth surrounded by all the pomp and power of an empire at its peak. in reality the book is about failure and indecision, about the useless sacrifice of thousands in a vain and pointless enterprise that somehow manages to sum up all that is wrong with man's ambition - in fact, Napoleon summed it all up when he coined his quip on reaching Warsaw, having abandoned his men; "From the sublime to the ridiculous there is but one step."Watching the build-up to the Russian
I was advised to read this book by our Kenny. And since when has he ever wrongly advised me of anything? That's right, most times never. Having known very little about Napoleon's military conquests and even less about the march to and retreat from Moscow, I was intrigued why Kenny would always mentions this one book repeatedly.So borrowing it from him, I found it be quite an in-depth analysis of Napoleon and Alexander and their respective thoughts on Europe. Certainly Napoleon's plans for a
The real Master, the man to whom all is permitted, can storm Toulon, stage a massacre in Paris, forget about an army in Egypt, throw away half a million men in the Moscow expedition and then get away with a witty phrase in Vilna, marvels Raskolnikov in Crime and Punishment. Yet altars are erected to him after his death, for to such a man all is permitted. No, such people are clearly not made of flesh, but of bronze!
0 Comments