Itemize Books Supposing Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
| Original Title: | Logisch-Philosophische Abhandlung |
| ISBN: | 0415254086 (ISBN13: 9780415254083) |
| Edition Language: | English |
Ludwig Wittgenstein
Paperback | Pages: 142 pages Rating: 4.07 | 15411 Users | 590 Reviews
Description During Books Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
Perhaps the most important work of philosophy written in the twentieth century, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus was the only philosophical work that Ludwig Wittgenstein published during his life. Written in short, carefully numbered paragraphs of extreme brilliance, it captured the imagination of a generation of philosophers. For Wittgenstein, logic was something we use to conquer a reality which is in itself both elusive and unobtainable. He famously summarized the book in the following words: 'What can be said at all can be said clearly; and what we cannot talk about we must pass over in silence.' David Pears and Brian McGuinness received the highest praise for their meticulous translation. The work is prefaced by Bertrand Russell's original introduction to the first English edition.
Specify Out Of Books Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
| Title | : | Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus |
| Author | : | Ludwig Wittgenstein |
| Book Format | : | Paperback |
| Book Edition | : | Deluxe Edition |
| Pages | : | Pages: 142 pages |
| Published | : | September 1st 2001 by Routledge Classics (first published 1921) |
| Categories | : | Philosophy. Nonfiction. Logic. Classics. Humanities. Language. Linguistics. European Literature. German Literature |
Rating Out Of Books Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
Ratings: 4.07 From 15411 Users | 590 ReviewsPiece Out Of Books Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
Wittgenstein says explicitly in the introduction of the book that no one has not already had these thoughts will be able to understand it, and should therefore not read it. No doubt this had a great affect on the size of The Tractatus' readership. I, having not fully had many of these thoughts, was nonetheless absolutely THRILLED by the book--it's abstruseness notwithstanding--to the point where I would bring it up in conversation with absolute strangers, which, needless to say, affected the"What you can't talk about, you have to shut up."So I keep my mouth shut. In any case, I would like to stay quiet, but it would not be enough seller, and I would not have the pleasure of being able to dissertation on this Tractatus politico-philosophical at my ease. Certainly, Ludwig Wittgenstein was not to be an advertiser, as he was not to be very talkative at the table or on a walk either.An exchange, at least. Yes, but this is not what Ludwig's language should be. Writing must be to transmit
The Tractatus is a mesmerizing pile of poo. I spent a semester trying to understand whatever it was that Wittgenstein seemed to have stumbled upon... it turns out that this is just nothing more than an engineer writing bad poetry. Crap. Absolute crap.."Whereof that which we cannot speak we must pass over in silence." What the devil is this? It's a coward's way out. Translation: "I can't roll with the big dogs so I'm going to take my ball and go home."If you want to read some philosophy, go
Revisiting this with formal logic and knowledge of Frege and Russell under my belt changed the experience tremendously. It reveals a work as strange and idiosyncratic in approach as it is insightful. For example universal generality, a very basic operator (i.e. -all- men are moral), is something Witt provides good reasons for being skeptical of, though the point presses more on what we assume when we use them rather than their use, and I feel you first have to take (∀x) for granted before
Get your P's and Q's ready, folks, because we're in for the ride of our lives. Or not.Wittgenstein was living proof that androids were around and functioning during WWI. That at least this single android had a sense of humor dry enough to turn the Mariana Trench into the Mojave Desert, too.Or was this a joke at all? Let's see.Most of the numbered propositions were imminently clear and devoted to a single purpose: describing reality.Language is the big limiter, which should never be a big
Sure, it's not the easiest thing to comprehend given Wittgenstein's autistic-child writing style, and sure, it's not something I agree with that often, given both my materialist leanings and my greater love of Wittgenstein's later repudiations of his earlier work. Is this important and influential? God yes. Does that make it worth reading? Probably. Did I enjoy it? No, not at all, especially given that the logical positivist program it inspired -- while equally important and influential --
0 Comments